Page 1 of 1

RDMLX - You can not use Web Authentication or a proxy server

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:39 pm
by LEBAS
Is it possible to have more details on the following sentence in the Getting Started with LongRange LANSA | System Requirements: “You can not use Web Authentication or a proxy server.”?

Web authentication
• What is restricted: Web server authentication (IIS on Windows and/or Apache on IBM i) and/or LANSA for the Web authentication?
• Do LRUAVAIL/LRULOGON reusable parts apply to both IBM i and Windows? What type of authentication is used by them?


Proxy server
• If it is restricted on IBM i, I don’t understand what was said in Tips, Techniques and Examples | Some basic security configuration combinations by MarkDuignan » Wed Aug 22,012
Basic Usage - Classic LAN/WAN  + Internet via DMZ
Basic Usage - Classic LAN/WAN + Internet via DMZ
image1.png (179.65 KiB) Viewed 2735 times
• Is it only restricted for Windows?

Regards,

Yann

Re: RDMLX - You can not use Web Authentication or a proxy se

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:16 am
by MarkDuignan
The wording in the Getting Started guide is possibly heavy handed. What it is trying to express is that the client is not a web browser – just as a client for web services (say) may not be web browser. Therefore your L4Web server instance cannot respond the client as if it was a web browser. This means browser based authentification techniques, redirections and proxy server ‘tricks’ are all likely to cause issues with the client.

The diagrams use reverse proxy servers – which is a recommended and supported technique for use with aXes-LongRange. Personally I have never seen this type of configuration used with a L4Web instance - people tend to use the ‘model B’ configurations instead – but I can see no particular reason why you could not get it to work.

The security model for mobile apps is an evolving area – so for the moment the recommended technique is as provided in the shipped examples.
This allows for more flexibility – for example by registering ‘devices’ by their GUID and making users sign on/off on a transactional basis it is possible for many users in a warehouse (say) to securely share an iPad. It also makes it easy to deregister a device (say) instead of a user. I don’t think there is a one size-fits-all solution for mobile solutions in this area. The missing part in the shipped example is how to validate a user against Windows – as opposed to using a custom user or device based models.